- Published on Friday, 30 October 2015 16:36
And the ethical breaches keep on coming from the Ryba camp….I’m so tired of seeing that smiling face when she’s acting with such disregard for the law…and in a campaign for the judiciary?
(At least this time I’m not alone in my observance of unethical behavior unbecoming a judge…seems this behavior might be in contrast with her “rating.” Bet I know who got that for her!)
Opinion 09-162 (citations omitted). The above-referenced principles also apply here.
Under the circumstances you have presented, you are advised that it would be misleading for you to state in your campaign material that you are the “only Supreme Court candidate in the 3rd Judicial District to have interviewed with the Independent Judicial Election Qualification Commission and to have received a ‘qualified’ rating,” as this statement is likely to create an impression that your opponent may have interviewed with the IJEQC and failed to secure a “qualified” rating, and this is contrary to your own understanding that your opponent has not applied for a rating.
Ryba's response to the above: